|
Scalasca
(Scalasca 2.6.2, revision 30af1b6e)
Scalable Performance Analysis of Large-Scale Applications
|
The instrumented executable prepared in the previous step can now be executed under the control of the scalasca -analyze (or short scan) convenience command to perform an initial summary measurement:
$ cd bin
$ scalasca -analyze mpiexec -n 144 ./bt.D.144
S=C=A=N: Scalasca 2.5 runtime summarization
S=C=A=N: ./scorep_bt_144_sum experiment archive
S=C=A=N: Mon Mar 18 13:44:46 2019: Collect start
mpiexec -n 144 ./bt.D.144
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 -- BT Benchmark
No input file inputbt.data. Using compiled defaults
Size: 408x 408x 408
Iterations: 250 dt: 0.0000200
Number of active processes: 144
Time step 1
Time step 20
Time step 40
Time step 60
Time step 80
Time step 100
Time step 120
Time step 140
Time step 160
Time step 180
Time step 200
Time step 220
Time step 240
Time step 250
Verification being performed for class D
accuracy setting for epsilon = 0.1000000000000E-07
Comparison of RMS-norms of residual
1 0.2533188551738E+05 0.2533188551738E+05 0.1499315900507E-12
2 0.2346393716980E+04 0.2346393716980E+04 0.8546885387975E-13
3 0.6294554366904E+04 0.6294554366904E+04 0.2745293523008E-14
4 0.5352565376030E+04 0.5352565376030E+04 0.8376934357159E-13
5 0.3905864038618E+05 0.3905864038618E+05 0.6650300273080E-13
Comparison of RMS-norms of solution error
1 0.3100009377557E+03 0.3100009377557E+03 0.1373406191445E-12
2 0.2424086324913E+02 0.2424086324913E+02 0.1600422929406E-12
3 0.7782212022645E+02 0.7782212022645E+02 0.4090394153928E-13
4 0.6835623860116E+02 0.6835623860116E+02 0.3596566920650E-13
5 0.6065737200368E+03 0.6065737200368E+03 0.2605201960010E-13
Verification Successful
BT Benchmark Completed.
Class = D
Size = 408x 408x 408
Iterations = 250
Time in seconds = 413.25
Total processes = 144
Compiled procs = 144
Mop/s total = 141162.75
Mop/s/process = 980.30
Operation type = floating point
Verification = SUCCESSFUL
Version = 3.3.1
Compile date = 18 Mar 2019
Compile options:
MPIF77 = scorep mpifort
FLINK = $(MPIF77)
FMPI_LIB = (none)
FMPI_INC = (none)
FFLAGS = -O2
FLINKFLAGS = -O2
RAND = (none)
Please send feedbacks and/or the results of this run to:
NPB Development Team
Internet: npb@nas.nasa.gov
S=C=A=N: Mon Mar 18 13:51:47 2019: Collect done (status=0) 421s
S=C=A=N: ./scorep_bt_144_sum complete.
$ ls scorep_bt_144_sum
MANIFEST.md profile.cubex scorep.cfg scorep.log
As can be seen, the measurement run successfully produced an experiment directory named scorep_bt_144_sum containing
MANIFEST.md briefly describing the directory contents produced by the Score-P measurement system,profile.cubex,scorep.cfg, andscorep.log.However, application execution took almost twice as long as the reference run (413.25 vs. 216.00 seconds). That is, instrumentation and associated measurements introduced a non-negligible amount of run-time overhead. While it is possible to interactively examine the generated summary result file using the Cube report browser, this should only be done with great caution since the substantial overhead negatively impacts the accuracy of the measurement. Therefore, such measurements can easily be misleading.
![]() |
Copyright © 1998–2025 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH,
Jülich Supercomputing Centre
Copyright © 2009–2015 German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH, Laboratory for Parallel Programming |